Boosting Wound Care Adherence: Practical Strategies for Offloading, Dressing Changes & Follow-Up

Patient adherence is one of the biggest determinants of wound-healing success. Offloading devices, timely dressing changes, and regular follow-up appointments are proven tools for healing, but only if patients actually use them. This practical guide explains why adherence often fails, summarizes evidence-based techniques to improve it, and gives step-by-step recommendations clinicians and wound teams can implement today.

Why adherence matters

• Offloading (pressure relief) is central to healing plantar neuropathic and diabetic foot ulcers; non-adherence is associated with slower healing and higher recurrence.

• Regular, correct dressing changes keep the wound environment optimal and lower infection risk; missed or improper changes can stall healing.

• Timely follow-up enables early escalation for infection, ischemia, or non-healing and links patients to multidisciplinary support. Telemedicine and home health can improve access.
  
  

Those three areas (offloading, dressing care, follow-up) are interdependent: poor adherence in any one increases the chance of complications in the others.

Common barriers to adherence

Understanding why patients don’t adhere helps us design realistic solutions. Studies identify both practical and psychological barriers:

Practical barriers:

• Discomfort, pain, or reduced mobility with offloading devices or dressings.

• Cost, transport, and clinic-access difficulties for follow-up visits.

• Confusing instructions or literacy/language gaps about dressing technique and device use.
  
  

Psychological and social barriers:

• Low perceived benefit; patients don’t see the immediate payoff of adherence.

• Device stigma (appearance of boots or casts), poor self-efficacy, or competing life priorities.

• Mental health issues, cognitive impairment, or lack of caregiver support.
  
  

Interventions that ignore these barriers are less likely to succeed. The good news: many are modifiable.

Evidence-based strategies that improve adherence

Below are approaches supported by wound-care research and related behavioral literature.

1) Prefer non-removable offloading when appropriate

Non-removable devices (total contact casts [TCCs], instant total contact casts) remove the choice to not offload and consistently show better healing rates than removable devices. For plantar diabetic foot ulcers, non-removable TCCs produce higher healing rates and shorter healing times. When a non-removable option is safe and acceptable, it’s one of the most robust ways to improve “adherence.”

Practical note: non-removable devices require clinic time to apply and expertise to monitor for complications; they may not be feasible for every patient.

2) Make devices and dressings more comfortable and acceptable

Comfort drives use. Customization (custom orthoses, padding), careful fitting, and patient-centered device selection reduce pain and increase daily wear time. Studies suggest custom footwear and individualized offloading plans perform better than one-size-fits-all approaches.

3) Use motivational interviewing and brief behavioral counseling

Motivational interviewing (MI), a patient-centered communication style that explores ambivalence and reinforces change, has been used in wound and diabetic foot care to improve self-care behaviors. Systematic reviews and trials show that MI and phased behavioral interventions can increase adherence behaviors when implemented by trained clinicians. Even short MI sessions can help patients commit to offloading or dressing routines.

How to start: integrate a 10–15 minute MI check at key visits and train nurses/podiatrists in core MI techniques (open questions, reflective listening, goal setting).

4) Simplify dressing instructions and use teach-back

Complex instructions reduce compliance. Use plain language, demonstrate dressing changes in clinic, and ask the patient (or caregiver) to show you back the technique (teach-back). Patient-centered education materials and repeat demonstrations increase proper dressing change performance.

5) Leverage technology: telehealth, apps, reminders, and smart sensors

Telemedicine and digital platforms can reduce travel burden, provide timely troubleshooting, and reinforce adherence with reminders and asynchronous image review. Several studies report telemedicine improves access and clinical metrics in wound care, and app-based nursing/telehealth models show acceptability in wound patients. Smart insoles and wearable sensors that detect pressure or temperature and send alerts are promising tools to encourage offloading and early escalation.

Practical tip: combine scheduled virtual check-ins with push reminders for dressing changes and device wear time.

6) Use multidisciplinary, patient-centered care pathways

Integrated care (podiatry, vascular surgery, infectious disease, nutrition, wound nurses, social work) addresses the full set of barriers: medical, behavioral, and logistical. Models that include home health nursing support and coordinated follow-up improve adherence to dressing schedules and clinic visits.

7) Address social determinants and logistical barriers

Practical support — transportation vouchers, home health nursing, low-cost supplies, or delivery services for dressings — removes major non-medical barriers. Screening for food insecurity, housing instability, or caregiver gaps should be routine in high-risk wound clinics.

8) Monitor progress with objective metrics and positive reinforcement

Set measurable milestones (e.g., 20–40% area reduction in 2–4 weeks) and share progress with patients. Objective photos, graphs of wound size, and positive feedback when adherence improves motivation. Regularly celebrate small wins to reinforce behavior.

Practical, step-by-step protocol clinics can adopt

1. Baseline assessment at first visit

   • Screen for barriers (pain, cognition, transport, finances), document comorbidities, and measure baseline wound metrics.

2. Collaborative plan & teach-back

   • Co-create an offloading/dressing/follow-up plan with the patient; demonstrate tasks and use teach-back. Provide written and pictorial instructions.

3. Prefer non-removable offloading when clinically appropriate

   • If safe and feasible, apply a TCC or instant TCC for plantar neuropathic ulcers to maximize offloading adherence.

4. Provide technology and reminders

   • Enroll patients in a telehealth pathway or a simple SMS reminder system for dressing changes and appointments. Offer smartphone photo upload options for quick checks.

5. Schedule regular, brief behavioral reinforcement

   • Use MI techniques during early follow-ups and schedule short calls from nursing staff between visits to troubleshoot and encourage adherence.

6. Address logistics

   • Arrange home nursing, delivery of supplies, transport assistance, or social work referrals as indicated.

7. Track and share progress

   • Use serial photos and wound measurement to show progress; if no improvement, escalate rapidly (vascular, infectious disease, or specialist referral).
     
     

What works for patients — practical tips to share

• Wear the offloading device as much as possible; short removals matter. Non-removable devices remove temptation and help healing.

• Keep a simple calendar or set phone reminders for dressing changes. Ask for a printed picture of correct dressing technique.

• Report pain, redness, or new drainage early via telehealth or phone; early contact prevents complications.

• If the device feels painful or causes new sores, contact the clinic; adjustments can usually be made.
  
  

Limitations and realistic expectations

• Not all interventions work equally for every patient; adherence is multifactorial and often requires iterative problem solving.

• Non-removable devices are effective but are not always feasible (e.g., unstable patients, severe edema, or inability to access follow-up).

• Digital solutions help many but can widen disparities if patients lack smartphones or internet access; always offer non-digital alternatives.
  
  

Final practical checklist

• Screen barriers (pain, transport, finances, cognition).

• Use teach-back for dressing changes; give pictorial instructions and supplies at first visit.

• Prefer non-removable offloading for suitable plantar ulcers; customize devices for comfort.

• Implement brief motivational interviewing at early visits and nurse check-ins between visits.

• Offer telehealth/photo triage and automated reminders; provide non-digital backup.

• Provide logistic support (home nursing, supply delivery, transport) when needed.
  
  

See also

The Role of Nutrition in Wound Care: Best Foods for Healing
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Wound Care
How to Tell If a Wound Is Healing: Signs of Proper Wound Care Progress
Why Diabetic Foot Wounds Heal Slowly: Top Factors That Delay Recovery
How Often Should Wound Dressings Be Changed? Best Practices for Healing

More Information

For more information on the latest effective wound care, contact us to set up a time for a call.

Sources

1. Lazzarini PA, Jarl G, Gooday C, Viswanathan V, Caravaggi CF, Armstrong DG, Bus SA. Effectiveness of offloading interventions to heal foot ulcers in persons with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e3275. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3275. PMID: 32176438; PMCID: PMC8370012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370012/

2. Li B, Lin A, Huang J, Xie J, Liu Q, Yang C, Zhang Z. Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 26;14:1234761. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1234761. PMID: 37822605; PMCID: PMC10562689. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10562689/
   https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1234761/full

3. Ryan T. Crews, Biing-Jiun Shen, Laura Campbell, Peter J. Lamont, Andrew J.M. Boulton, Mark Peyrot, Robert S. Kirsner, Loretta Vileikyte; Role and Determinants of Adherence to Off-loading in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: A Prospective Investigation. Diabetes Care 1 August 2016; 39 (8): 1371–1377. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-2373 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955934/
   https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/39/8/1371/37082/Role-and-Determinants-of-Adherence-to-Off-loading

4. Moffatt C, Murray S, Keeley V, Aubeeluck A. Non-adherence to treatment of chronic wounds: patient versus professional perspectives. Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1305-1312. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12804. Epub 2017 Aug 30. PMID: 28857457; PMCID: PMC7950059. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7950059/

5. Zhang X, Guo Z, Duan Y, Sun C, Luo J. Effectiveness of Telemedicine on Wound-Related and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Wounds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e58553 doi: 10.2196/58553 PMID: 40493508 PMCID: 12173094 https://mhealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e58553
   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12173094/

6. Binning J, Woodburn J, Bus SA, Barn R. Motivational interviewing to improve adherence behaviours for the prevention of diabetic foot ulceration. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019 Feb;35(2):e3105. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3105. Epub 2018 Dec 19. PMID: 30513132. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30513132/

7. Simona Racaru, Layla Bolton Saghdaoui, Jaya Roy Choudhury, Mary Wells, Alun H. Davies,

   Offloading treatment in people with diabetic foot disease: A systematic scoping review on adherence to foot offloading, Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, Volume 16, Issue 5, 2022, 102493, ISSN 1871-4021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102493.

   https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402122001072

8. Jones K, Backhouse MR, Bruce J. Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses. J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Mar 25;16(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00614-2. PMID: 36966316; PMCID: PMC10039553. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039553/

9. Weller CD, Richards C, Turnour L and Team V (2021) Patient Explanation of Adherence and Non-Adherence to Venous Leg Ulcer Treatment: A Qualitative Study. Front. Pharmacol. 12:663570. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.663570 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.663570/full

10. Bus SA, Reeves ND, Armstrong DG, Najafi B. Offloading and adherence through technological advancements: Modern approaches for better foot care in diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Feb;40(2):e3769. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3769. PMID: 38536196; PMCID: PMC11464855. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11464855/

11. Brown-Johnson CG, Lessios AS, Thomas S, Kim M, Fukaya E, Wu S, Kling SMR, Brown G, Winget M. A Nurse-Led Care Delivery App and Telehealth System for Patients Requiring Wound Care: Mixed Methods Implementation and Evaluation Study. JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 23;7:e43258. doi: 10.2196/43258. PMID: 37610798; PMCID: PMC10483299. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483299/

12. McLean, K.A., Sgrò, A., Brown, L.R. et al. Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice. npj Digit. Med. 6, 85 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00824-9 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-023-00824-9

* This blog is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.